MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Finite Volume Method for Solving a Modified 3-D 3-Phase Black-Oil Hydrocarbon Secondary Migration Model, and Its Application to the Kuqa Depression of the Tarim Basin in Western China

2011· article· en· W1900167346 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Guangren Shi, Jinshan Ma, Xin‐She Yang, Junhua Chang, Jun Wan

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in petroleum exploration and development · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinite volume methodPetroleum engineeringDiscretizationGeologyContext (archaeology)Structural basinGeotechnical engineeringMechanicsMathematicsGeomorphologyPhysicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By using a finite volume method as a solver, a modified 3-D 3-phase (water, oil, gas) black-oil model for modeling hydrocarbon (HC) secondary migration in the context of basin modeling is presented in this paper. The model predicts the quantity and distribution of HC accumulation in space and time. The black-oil model used in basin modeling is more complex and more difficult to model than that in reservoir simulations, as the model includes variable simulation ranges, very long simulation times, initial conditions, natural sources and sinks, and reservoir gridcells. In the proposed finite volume formulation, the gridding of variable 3-D geological volumes is performed using perpendicular bisection (PEBI) gridcells, which makes the discretization and subsequent implementation of 3-phase flow equations much easier than when using hexahedral or tetrahedral gridcells. The stability and convergence of the solutions have been improved by using finite volumes with PEBI gridcells and the fully implicit formulation. A detailed case study in the Kuqa Depression of the Tarim Basin in western China shows that the simulation results and predictions agree well with field evaluations. Key words : Basin modeling; Secondary migration; Black-oil model; Finite volume method; PEBI gridding; Kuqa Depression

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.782
Threshold uncertainty score0.473

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in petroleum exploration and developmentSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207