Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les medias ont recemment rapporte plusieurs incidents de malfaisance financiere impliquant du personnel d'Eglise. Certains suggerent que la malfaisance financiere pourrait fort bien etre le prochain grand scandale au sein de l'Eglise. Cet article est une etude de la discipline penale de l'Eglise concernant la malfaisance financiere. Apres avoir revu les normes du Code de 1983 sur les biens temporels et la procedure penale, l'article identifie huit delits pouvant impliquer la malfaisance financiere. Tous ces delits entrainent des peines ferendae sententiae et la plupart proposent seulement des peines indeterminees qui ne peuvent etre perpetuelles (canon 1349); il est donc impossible d'imposer des peines expiatoires de privation d'office (canon 1336, §1, 5°). Cet article rappelle que la malfaisance financiere peut occasionner une revocation administrative d'un office et identifie des controles internes pour prevenir la malfaisance financiere. Il considere aussi la possibilite d'etablir des lois penales particulieres pour empecher la malfaisance financiere et punir les coupables.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it