MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1900804467

La economía política de la educación superior en la era de la globalización neoliberal: América Latina desde una perspectiva comparatista.

2001· article· es· W1900804467 on OpenAlexaff
Carlos Alberto Torres, Daniel Schugurensky

Bibliographic record

VenuePerfiles Educativos · 2001
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHigher Education and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Christian Studies
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Los cambios actuales en la educacion latinoamericana no pueden estudiarse sin considerar los cambios politicos y economicos generales en la region, a su vez inscritos en la dinamica de la globalizacion. Despues del declive de los modelos socialistas del Estado de bienestar social, los gobiernos neoliberales dominan en muchas partes del mundo. En la mayoria de los paises, los cambios en los acuerdos financieros, aunados a mecanismos de rentabilidad, han obligado a las universidades a reconsiderar su mision social, sus prioridades academicas y sus estructuras organizativas. Este articulo describe el contexto en el que se dan los cambios en la universidad, centrandose en aspectos relacionados con la globalizacion y el neoliberalismo; asimismo, examina las caracteristicas principales de las reestructuraciones universitarias desde una perspectiva comparatista, con especial enfasis en el caso de America Latina

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.135

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.006
Scholarly communication0.0100.005
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.367 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePerfiles EducativosSame topicHigher Education and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207