MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Industrial Corruption: The main culprit for the relationship between Husband and wife in “Odour of Chrysanthemums”

2010· article· en· W1901149281 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Cai Yamin

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicModernist Literature and Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWifeLanguage changeHumanitiesRelation (database)SociologyPhilosophyEthnologyPolitical scienceLawArtLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The relationship between man and woman is one of the main foci of D.H.Lawrence, a famous English writer. On the basis of a careful analysis of his short story--“Odor of Chrysanthemums”, the present writer tries to prove that the industrial corruption is the main culprit for the dead relationship between husband and wife, a major one of the relations between man and woman in human society. Key words: relationship between husband and wife, industrial corruption, main culprit Resume: La relation entre l’homme et la femme est l’un des themes de D.H. Lawrence. A travers l’analyse minutieuse de son roman Odour of Chrysanthemums, l’auteur tente de prouver que la corruption industrielle est le coupable principal de l’aggravation de la relation entre la mari et la femme dans le roman, alors que le relation conjugale est l’une des relations importantes de la societe humaine. Mots-Cles: relation conjugale, corruption industrielle, coupable

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0080.017
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.159
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.132 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social scienceSame topicModernist Literature and CriticismFrench-language works237,207