Quantifying lateral and intratidal variability in water level and velocity in a tide‐dominated river using combined RTK GPS and ADCP measurements
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cross‐sectional gradients in water levels and velocities play a determining role in the circulation dynamics of tidal rivers and estuaries. Documenting and analyzing their variability throughout a tidal cycle require observations with high spatial and temporal resolution. A survey strategy and a data analysis procedure have been designed to obtain continuous and synoptic water level and velocity fields over a tidal cycle, along 13 cross‐sections of the St. Lawrence fluvial estuary dominated by large tidal ranges. The method combines both RTK GPS and ADCP technologies for the simultaneous measurement of water levels and velocities along repeated boat transects, allowing fast data acquisition over wide river sections and under rapidly changing conditions. The reconstruction of continuous and synoptic fields is made by interpolation. Simplifying assumptions about data stationarity and/or homogeneity are avoided by adapting the interpolation procedures to the shape and distribution of the underlying data in a space‐time reference frame, thus minimizing distortion in the reconstructed quantities. The capabilities and limitations of the method are assessed through error computations and comparisons with alternate data analysis methods and complementary data sets from tide gauges. With these latest observations, new insights into the tidal hydrodynamics of the St. Lawrence fluvial estuary are gained in regions of contrasting tidal and fluvial properties, specifically related to the effects of channel curvature and bathymetry on tidal propagation and cross‐channel flow properties at the intratidal scale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".