CENTROS DE EXCELENCIA EN ENFERMERÍA DE REHABILITACIÓN: UN SUEÑO A ALCANZAR.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En este artículo presentamos el enfoque teórico y resultados del proyecto ¿Desarrollo de Centros de Excelencia en Servicios de Enfermería en Rehabilitación¿, llevado a cabo entre los años 1995 y 2001, a través de una red colaboradora de países del sur y del norte de América. Protagonistas en este proyecto fueron el Hospital Monte Sinaí (Toronto, Canadá), la Organización Profesional de Enfermeras de Ontario (RNAO), la Organización Panamericana de la Salud (OPS) y centros hospitalarios en Chile, Colombia, Cuba y México. Exploramos aquí el concepto de los Centros de Excelencia y resaltamos su sintonía con propuestas pedagógicas propias de América Latina, como la de la educación liberadora de Paulo Freire. Desde esa perspectiva, el presente artículo resalta algunas lecciones que pueden ser transferidas a las instituciones de salud en el área de rehabilitación, especialmente del paciente en coma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".