MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1901640163 · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2001.938812

Adaptive resonance theory networks using incremental communication

2002· article· en· W1901640163 on OpenAlexaff
M. Chen, Ali A. Ghorbani, Virendrakumar C. Bhavsar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceConvergence (economics)Adaptive resonance theoryNode (physics)ImplementationCommunications systemArtificial neural networkFloating pointTelecommunications networkBounded functionAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceMathematicsComputer networkEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The incremental inter-node communication method is applied to the adaptive resonance theory 2 (ART2) networks. The incremental communication is aimed at reducing the communication costs of parallel and VLSI implementations of artificial neural networks. An ART2 node architecture incorporating the incremental communication is presented. A simulator is developed to study the behavior of ART2 networks with varying precisions of incremental data communication. Experiments are carried out to study the effects of the incremental communication on the convergence and savings in communication costs. We have found that even 7-bit precision in fixed-point and 13-bit (including 8-bit exponent) floating-point representations may be sufficient for the network to give the same results as those with conventional communication using 32-bit precision. The simulation results show that the limited precision errors are bounded and do not seriously affect the convergence of ART2 networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNeural Networks and Applications→French-language works237,207→