Bibliographic record
Abstract
Additional index words.Fragaria ×ananassa, strawberry breeding 'MNUS 248 (Fig. 1) is a June-bearing (short-day) strawberry (Fragaria ×ananassa Duch.) that is notable for its combination of high productivity; midseason ripening period; a fruit with a smooth, creamy fruit texture; resistance to five Eastern North American races of Phytophthora fragariae Hickman, the causal organism of red stele root rot; and moderate resistance to several other diseases.It has seldom shown symptoms of winter injury in the continental climate of Minnesota where it was developed.It will likely be useful for matted-row production by strawberry producers in the midwestern and northeastern United States and adjacent parts of Canada.'MNUS 248 is the second cultivar to be released from a breeding program begun in 1980 through the collaboration of the Univ. of Minnesota and the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS) Fruit Laboratory in Beltsville, Md.The program was initiated to address the needs of strawberry producers in the midwestern United States who desire cold-hardy cultivars that have high-quality fruit and resistance to red stele root rot as well as other diseases.In this program, seedlings were germinated and screened for red stele root rot in greenhouse bench tests in Maryland and subsequently planted in Minnesota, where selection and testing was performed.'MNUS 248 is sold as Mesabi ™ strawberry.Mesabi is a transliteration of the word for giant from the language of the Ojibwe people of northern Minnesota.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.462 | 0.146 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".