Psychotropic and Anticonvulsant Medication: Individuals With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Who Transitioned to the Community From an Institution
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Influenced by Georgia's settlement agreement with the United States Department of Justice relating to the enforcement of the Americans with Disabilities Act, an increasing number of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) are transitioning from institutions to community living. In this study we evaluate the pattern of medication use among individuals who recently transitioned to the community (IRTC), comparing results to the IDD population already residing in the community (comparison group). Average use and prevalence rates were trended over time, between January 1, 2010, and December 31. 2012. Findings indicate a significant increase in medication use in the IRTC and comparison group, with a greater and faster increase in the IRTC population. We suggest the transition process should be examined and revised, ensuring adequate preparation time and training for each person and relevant staff, particularly on medications and challenging behaviors. Several demographic trends were also significant and are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it