MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1901995672 · doi:10.7202/008518ar

Structures de la consommation au Canada

2004· article· fr· W1901995672 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Simon Langlois

Bibliographic record

VenueSociologie et sociétés · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIncome, Poverty, and Inequality
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’article scrute l’évolution de la structure des besoins sociaux des ménages canadiens sur une période de trente ans (de 1969 à 2000 ) à partir des enquêtes sur les dépenses des ménages. Trois types d’effets sont analysés. L’effet de période montre une régression de l’importance relative de l’alimentation dans la structure des besoins et une augmentation de la place des transports et du logement. De nombreux effets de génération sont mis en évidence qui illustrent une certaine détérioration de la situation relative des jeunes ménages. La diffusion sociale diffère de la diffusion temporelle et les évolutions temporelles n’effacent pas les différences observées au plan transversal, comme le montrent les dépenses pour le logement. Les deux types de diffusion des besoins peuvent aussi aller dans le même sens comme le montre le poste transport dans les budgets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.326
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.194
GPT teacher head0.480
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2004
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSociologie et sociétésSame topicIncome, Poverty, and InequalityFrench-language works237,207