MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W190234614

Crossings and nestings in four combinatorial families

2009· dissertation· en· W190234614 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Sophie Burrill

Bibliographic record

VenueSummit (Simon Fraser University) · 2009
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Combinatorial Mathematics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBijection, injection and surjectionEnumerationCombinatoricsNesting (process)MathematicsLattice (music)BijectionRepresentation (politics)Set (abstract data type)Discrete mathematicsComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The combinatorial families of matchings, set partitions, permutations and graphs can each be represented by a series of vertices along a horizontal line with arcs connecting them. Such a representation is referred to as an arc annotated sequence. A natural crossing and nesting structure arises in each of these representations, and remarkably enough, equidistribution between these two statistics has been shown for both matchings and partitions. To show this, tools such as RSK and several bijections are required. Furthermore, other useful bijections to lattice paths, and Ferrers diagrams give additional information, and aid the enumeration for each of the four families according to these two statistics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSummit (Simon Fraser University)Same topicAdvanced Combinatorial MathematicsFrench-language works237,207