Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article [1] traite de l’imputabilite des dirigeants publics dans un contexte ou la gestion des interfaces entre elus, fonctionnaires et managers de haut rang des organisations publiques se complexifie sans cesse. Les auteurs proposent d’abord une grille conceptuelle qui permet de saisir cette complexite generatrice de tensions a quatre niveaux : institutionnel, organisationnel, managerial et artefactuel. Ils l’illustrent ensuite plus concretement en expliquant la trajectoire historique de la notion d’imputabilite et des facons de la concretiser au sein du systeme de gouvernance publique du Quebec. Ils plaident au fond en faveur d’un jumelage des approches institutionnelle et instrumentale de l’imputabilite politico-administrative et manageriale. Celle-ci devrait etre concue et deployee en pretant particulierement attention aux dilemmes, paradoxes et incertitudes que l’action publique genere inevitablement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".