MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1902652996 · doi:10.1086/301537

The H [CSC]ii[/CSC] Regions of the Extreme Outer Disk of NGC 628

2000· article· en· W1902652996 on OpenAlexaff
Mario Lelièvre, Jean-René Roy

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astronomical Journal · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsSpiral galaxyLuminosityGalaxyPower lawH II regionStar formationLuminosity functionNebulaAstronomyFlux (metallurgy)Galaxy rotation curveStarsGalaxy formation and evolution

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Employing deep Hα narrowband imagery, we identified and measured the fluxes of 137 small H II regions in the extreme outer disk (R ≥ R25) of the nearly face-on, Sc I galaxy NGC 628. A majority of these H II regions are located in two faint, outer spiral arms visible in H I maps. The faintest H II regions that could be measured have fluxes of only a few times 10-16 ergs cm-2 s-1, which correspond to luminosities of ∼1036 ergs s-1, or a fraction of the Orion Nebula luminosity. The most distant object detected is at R ∼ 27 kpc from the galaxy center. The massive star formation rate, as measured from the azimuthally averaged Hα flux, is consistent with a monotonic decrease as far as R ≈ 1.3R25 (20 kpc), where there is a sharp drop. The Schmidt law for the whole disk of NGC 628 corresponds to a relatively steep power law with n = 2.9 ± 0.2, but it "fails" below Σgas ≤ 4 M⊙ pc-2; the index depends strongly on the CO data used. We derived the luminosity function (LF) of 598 H II regions over the whole disk, and we compared the shapes of the cumulative LFs between R ≥ R25 and R < R25; the LF of the outer regions is significantly steeper than that of the inner regions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations59
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astronomical JournalSame topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207