Hybrid Function Projective Synchronization of Chaotic Systems with Fully Unknown Parameters
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To compensate for projective synchronization (PS) and function projective synchronization (FPS), we propose a hybrid function projective synchronization (HFPS), which applies the different time-varying functions as the synchronization scaling factors. Based on the adaptive control method, we design a simple controller and a set of update laws of unknown parameters to carry out HFPS in identical and different chaotic systems with fully unknown parameters. According to the Lyapunov stability theorem and the Barbalat lemma, we prove the asymptotical stability of the error dynamical system at the origin. Then two numerical examples are given to validate the feasibility and effectiveness of the developed procedure in this paper. Key Words: Hybrid function projective synchronization; Lyapunov stability theorem; Adaptive control; Unknown parameters
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it