Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans le contexte des réformes survenues en Colombie après l’adoption de la Constitution de 1991, spécialement en ce qui concerne la formulation des Plans de vie, cet article décrit et analyse l’usage cosmopolitique que l’Association des capitaines autochtones du fleuve Pirá-paraná (ACAIPI – Asociación de Capitanes Indígenas del río Pirá-paraná) de l’Amazonie colombienne a donné à son concept de « calendrier écologique ». Ce concept local, utilisé pour revendiquer et négocier le mode de vie de ces autochtones face aux acteurs de l’État, prend un sens différent dans les liens politiques avec les organisations autochtones brésiliennes, et ce, dans le but d’une rétroaction sur des expériences distinctes et une recherche de points communs pour consolider la gestion autonome de leurs territoires.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it