MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1903201401

Emerald Ash Borer Canadian Program Update

2005· article· en· W1903201401 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mélanie Mecteau

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicForest Insect Ecology and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmerald ash borerAgricultureChristian ministryAgency (philosophy)GeographyForestryEnvironmental protectionPolitical scienceFraxinusArchaeologyEcologyBiologyLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

actions to manage invasive quarantine pests, including the emerald ash borer, that are threats to Canada’s agricultural and forestry sectors. In the fall of 2002, the Agency brought together a Science and Risk Mitigation Committee to evaluate the known science, identify research priorities and to develop strategies and policies to contain the emerald ash borer. The Committee consists of scientists and regulatory experts from Natural Resources Canada Canadian Forest Service, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food, the United States Department of Agriculture and the Canadian Food Inspection Agency. Both delimitation and detection surveys were conducted by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency throughout 2003 to determine the extent and severity of the emerald ash borer infestation in Ontario. To date, the pest has been detected in Essex County and in three isolated locations in the western end of the Municipality of Chatham-Kent. An estimated 200,000 ash trees in Essex County are believed to be infested and likely to die over the next year. The emerald ash borer has already killed over 7 millions ash trees in Michigan and has spread to Ohio, Maryland and Virginia. The strategy for 2002-03 called for intensive surveys and strategic tree cutting of infested ash trees along the leading edge of the infestation. To date, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency has authorized removal of approximately 10,000 trees at the Agency’s expense. Much of the infested ash material has either been reduced to chips or burned. Targeted surveys are conducted at other high-risk areas in Ontario to which the emerald ash borer may have been artificially introduced such as parks, campgrounds and sawmills. The Canadian Food Inspection Agency has accepted, in November of 2003, the recommendations of the Science and Risk Mitigation Committee that an ash-free zone would be effective in preventing or slowing the spread The emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire) is an invasive alien pest native to eastern Asia and was first confirmed to be present in Canada in August of 2002. Based on a pest risk assessment completed by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency in August 2002, the emerald ash borer was identified as a pest which could have a major impact on ash trees in both urban and forested settings throughout their range in Canada and the U.S. Ash trees are very valuable both from an economic and an environmental perspective. They are commonly planted in urban settings, reforestation projects, shelter belts and are used in the manufacture of furniture and sporting goods, such as baseball bats and hockey sticks. They are a major component of southern Ontario forests. The emerald ash borer is a primary tree killer, i.e. it attacks and kills healthy trees. Trees are killed when the larval stage of the beetle girdles the vascular area of the tree and cuts off the flow of nutrients. Most ash trees that are infested with the emerald ash borer will die within a year. On September 17, 2002, a Ministerial Order was enacted to prevent the spread of the emerald ash borer from the Windsor, Ontario area. The order prohibits or restricts the movement of nursery stock, trees, logs, lumber and wood with bark attached, wood chips or bark chips in the genus Fraxinus (commonly known as Ash) and on firewood of all tree species. Surveys conducted by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency in 2003 indicated the beetle is now distributed throughout Essex County and it would be necessary to expand the area under quarantine. The Emerald Ash Borer Infested Places Order has been amended in November 2003 to include all of Essex County to ensure that newly discovered infested areas are regulated. The Canadian Food Inspection Agency has the legal authority, under the Plant Protection Act, to take control

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.172

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0510.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicForest Insect Ecology and Management→French-language works237,207→