MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1903226867 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2004.1347721

Multicast routing with delay and delay variation constraints using genetic algorithm

2004· article· en· W1903226867 on OpenAlex
M. Hamdan, M.E. El-Hawary

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMulticastComputer scienceRouting (electronic design automation)End-to-end delayComputer networkDistance Vector Multicast Routing ProtocolAlgorithmQuality of serviceGenetic algorithmElmore delayDistributed computingXcastPropagation delayDelay calculation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper presents a constrained multicast routing scheme based on genetic algorithm (GA). The paper considers two constraints which represent quality of service (QoS) measures that a network should provide for real-time applications. First, a constraint on end-to-end delay from source to each destination, second, bounded delay variations along the paths from source to each destination. A genetic algorithm for delay and delay variation multicast routing (GADVM) is proposed. The performance of the proposed algorithm is evaluated through simulations and compared with four known multicast routing algorithms, namely, BSMA, CDKS, SPT, and KPP. Two performance metrics are considered, the failure rate and average cost per path. It is demonstrated that the GADVM algorithm compares favourably and gives much lower failure rates; its cost is also comparable with, and in some cases is better than, other algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score0.368

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlFrench-language works237,207