L'action sociale des caisses de retraite : un dispositif complémentaire de la protection sociale des personnes âgées
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé Les politiques sociales connaissent de profondes restructurations qui affectent tant les interventions de l’État que les prestations sociales offertes par d’autres institutions. Dans ce cadre, cet article se concentre sur l’évolution de l’action sociale des caisses de retraite en examinant son rôle dans le système de gestion de la vieillesse. En proposant aux retraités toute une série d’aides plus ou moins innovantes, l’action sociale répond aux ambitions généralistes de la politique nationale de la vieillesse mise en place depuis les années soixante-dix. Elle participe à l’intégration sociale des retraités et constitue de fait un complément aux transferts assurantiels. Néanmoins, elle est aujourd’hui prise dans une dynamique de redéfinition de ses priorités en se ciblant avant tout sur les populations les plus démunies. Cette évolution permet de s’interroger sur les transformations de la protection sociale et notamment sur les tensions entre l’universalité des prestations sociales et l’assistance aux plus défavorisés.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".