The Mission of the University. Professional File. Number 26.
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame — the usual design — would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
The three-model screen
all 1,000 screened works →1 of 3 models called this metaresearch. This work is contested: it sits on the field's empirical boundary, and whether it counts depends on which model you asked. It is one of the 51 works in the disagreement dossier.
No abstract; a higher-education society paper on the mission of the university, which would place the academic institution (and its research mission) as the object, but the title alone cannot settle tier or whether Canadian academia is substantively studied.
The abstract is missing and the title alone does not establish that the work studies research itself.
Title on university mission is higher-education general; abstract missing, so cannot establish research as the object.
Abstract
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database — OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
The record
- Venue
- Canadian Society for the Study of Higher Education
- Topic
- Higher Education Governance and Development
- Field
- Social Sciences
- Canadian institutions
- —
- Funders
- —
- Keywords
- BusinessSociology
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- no