MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1903626102 · doi:10.1109/icecs.2002.1046427

Optimization of the three-step search algorithm by exclusion of stationary macroblocks from the search process

2003· article· en· W1903626102 on OpenAlexaff
Chunjiang Duanmu, M. Omair Ahmad, M.N.S. Swamy, Ali Shatnawi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Coding and Compression Technologies
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMacroblockComputer scienceAlgorithmBlock-matching algorithmSpeedupBlock (permutation group theory)Motion estimationProcess (computing)Frame (networking)Artificial intelligenceInter frameReference frameComputer visionMathematicsVideo trackingVideo processingDecoding methods

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A typical video frame contains many macroblocks that experience little motion with respect to the reference frame. These macroblocks are referred to as stationary macroblocks. This paper aims at accelerating the three-step search algorithm for block motion estimation (BME) by excluding these stationary macroblocks from the search process. A method to detect these stationary macroblocks by comparing the mean absolute difference between the current macroblock and the reference macroblock with a given threshold is first proposed. In order to make the algorithm more efficient, a mechanism to adapt the threshold level to the changing statistics of the video sequence is then developed. Simulation results demonstrate that by using the proposed algorithm, a speedup of 20 to 40 percent is achieved for typical video test sequences. The accuracy of the proposed algorithm remains about the same as that of the three-step search algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.849
Threshold uncertainty score0.261

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVideo Coding and Compression TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207