MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Exploration of Architectural Context from Aesthetics View

2012· article· en· W1903875840 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Li Miao

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in sociology of science · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Media and Visual Art
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContextualismArchitectureContext (archaeology)History of architectureSociologyAestheticsEpistemologyArchitectural engineeringHistoryEngineeringArtPhilosophyArchaeologyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the change of the material environment on which architect depends and inter-infiltration of environmental sciences, ecological science, and humane studies, architectural theories and practices have been developed and completed continuously toward a more scientific, ethnic, and local direction. This paper gets the historical basis and judgment standards of Chinese modern architecture creation by providing detailed illustration of the current situation of Chinese and other countries’ architecture fields, development of Western architectural theories and Chinese traditional architectural culture, and influences process of regional culture on Chinese modern architectural creation. This paper also gives out some advantageous methods and research conclusions by summing up Contextualism related theories and systematic research on typical cases in the architecture history. Key words: Contextualism; City; Architecture

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.010
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.157
GPT teacher head0.398
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in sociology of scienceSame topicDigital Media and Visual ArtFrench-language works237,207