Bibliographic record
Abstract
For a number of years already I’ve been absolutely fascinated, no, hypnotized, yes, hypnotized, by the Big Bang theory. What a fantastic theory that is. Have you heard of that one? It’s a big one. It’s a popular one. It was everywhere and still is as far as I know. Books, articles, documentaries, lectures, TV programs, and much more – it’s all there. Oh, how much I wanted to be there, at the beginning, witnessing it all. I wanted to see the Big Bang and whatever happened right after but it was so long ago, well before my time. I bet I am not alone with my dreams and what a dream that is. What really happened back then and there? How much do we really know and how much is a pure speculation? Keywords: Big Bang theory; Universe; stars; sun; planets; energy; magnetic field; gravitation; Edwin Hubble; Galaxies; Mobius strip; black holes; Doppler; matter; antimatter; Hoyle; Hawking; Perpetuum Mobile; pulsating.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".