MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W190402006 · doi:10.32920/24615456.v1

Bond Duration: A Pedagogic Illustration

2023· article· en· W190402006 on OpenAlexaff
Yi Feng, Clarence C. Y. Kwan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDuration (music)BondComputer sciencePerspective (graphical)Measure (data warehouse)Artificial intelligenceEconomicsData miningFinanceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p> In view of the importance of reliable duration measures for bond immunization strategies, this paper considers, from a pedagogic perspective, the duration concept. Both a basic bond model and a more realistic bond model, which accounts for the accrued interest, are considered. The use of graphical features and scroll bars in Microsoft Excel<sup> TM</sup> allows the duration concept to be delivered via an interactive approach. This paper also addresses an unresolved issue on bond duration. Specically, it explains why a saw-toothed time pattern of traditionally-defined duration exists and provides a corrective measure, which is easy to implement on Excel. Analytical materials pertaining to bond duration, as well as illustrative examples based on actual bond quotation data, are provided. </p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.615
Threshold uncertainty score0.315

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectronic Packaging and Soldering TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207