A semi-analytical model for serpentine horizontal ground heat exchangers
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article focuses on a particular type of horizontal ground heat exchangers (HGHE) which can be used as a heat source (or heat sink) for geothermal heat pumps. It consists of a long pipe buried about 1 m below the ground surface and arranged in parallel regularly spaced sections, forming a serpentine. This article proposes a model for such a heat exchanger, where the serpentine is discretized axially and a three-step calculation procedure is performed on each node. The axial fluid temperature variation in the pipe is first computed by using an implicit numerical resolution scheme. Then, heat transfer in the ground surrounding the pipe is obtained by using the analytical cylindrical heat source solution. In the third step, used for mid- to long-term simulations, thermal interference between parallel pipe sections is taken into account using spatial superposition. Finally, these solutions are coupled iteratively to obtain the axial fluid and pipe temperatures at each time step. The model is then validated using a full-scale experimental facility located in Orléans, France. Following a brief description of the facility, validation results are reported. The main validation test consists of supplying the HGHE with a constant inlet fluid temperature (40°C [104°F]) for a 200-h period in soil at an initial temperature of 7.5°C (45.5°F). After an initial transient period, the recorded outlet fluid temperature matches the model prediction within 1°C (1.8°F).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it