MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1904662268 · doi:10.1109/elinsl.1990.109791

A surface resistivity probe for assessing solid insulators in GIS (gas insulated switchgear)

2002· article· en· W1904662268 on OpenAlexaff
J.M. Braun, F.Y. Chu, Ravi Seethapathy

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE International Symposium on Electrical Insulation · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicHigh voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena
Canadian institutionsHydro One (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSwitchgearElectrical resistivity and conductivityFault (geology)High voltageConformal mapHumidityMaterials scienceSurface (topology)ElectrodeElectrical engineeringMechanical engineeringVoltageComputer scienceEngineeringPhysicsGeologyMeteorologyGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The changes in surface characteristics after a spacer has been exposed to a large amount of SF/sub 6/ decomposition products for a short period of time, which is similar to conditions during fault repair, are described. The design and construction of a prototype surface electrical resistivity probe which can be used to assess the reusability of contaminated solid insulators are also described. This special, conformal surface resistivity probe was designed to carry out the demanding measurements on contoured surfaces. These measurements must be carried out under typical field conditions, and specifics of the critical experimental parameters (voltage, geometry, humidity) must be recognized. The probes have been used successfully to assess the condition of suspect spacers exposed to a high concentration of by-products following a power fault.>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE International Symposium on Electrical InsulationSame topicHigh voltage insulation and dielectric phenomenaFrench-language works237,207