MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1904897931 · doi:10.1109/ultsym.1992.275855

Enhanced cytotoxicity of dimethylformamide by ultrasound in vitro

2003· article· en· W1904897931 on OpenAlexaff
Russell Jeffers, Ruo Feng, J. Brian Fowlkes, J.W. Hunt, Charles A. Cain

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
Canadian institutionsOntario Institute for Cancer Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrobubblesCytotoxicityUltrasoundCavitationChemistryIn vitroDimethylformamideAlbuminBiophysicsBiomedical engineeringMaterials scienceSolventMedicineBiochemistryRadiologyBiologyPhysicsAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Polar solvents, including dimethylformamide (DMF), are investigated as anticancer drugs. The effects of a noncytotoxic DMF dose alone and with ultrasound exposure on HL-60 human promyelocytic leukemia cells grown in suspension culture are examined. The cells are insonified in a free field configuration which creates little cytotoxicity without the introduction of albumin stabilized microbubbles into the exposure chamber. When microbubbles are introduced, cytotoxicity of DMF and ultrasound is significantly higher than for ultrasound alone. The necessary presence of microbubbles for the enhanced cytotoxicity of DMF by ultrasound suggests that a likely enhancement mechanism is acoustic cavitation which should be initiated by the existence of microbubbles as nuclei. Albumin stabilized microbubbles, similar to those presently used as ultrasound contrast agents, may provide a significant source of nuclei and improve prospects for cancer therapy using acoustic cavitation.>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUltrasound and Hyperthermia ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207