MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1904955064 · doi:10.1152/jn.00479.2001

Spatiotemporal Activation of Lumbosacral Motoneurons in the Locomotor Step Cycle

2002· article· en· W1904955064 on OpenAlexaff
Sergiy Yakovenko, Vivian K. Mushahwar, Veronique VanderHorst, Gert Holstege, A. Procházka

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurophysiology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuscle activation and electromyography studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpinal cordHindlimbAnatomyLumbosacral jointNeuroscienceGait cycleBiologyPhysicsKinematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this study was to produce a dynamic model of the spatiotemporal activation of ensembles of alpha motoneurons (MNs) in the cat lumbosacral spinal cord during the locomotor step cycle. The coordinates of MNs of 27 hindlimb muscles of the cat were digitized from transverse sections of spinal cord spanning the entire lumbosacral enlargement from the caudal part of L(4) to the rostral part of S(1) segments. Outlines of the spinal cord gray matter were also digitized. Models of the spinal cord were generated from these digitized data and displayed on a computer screen as three-dimensional (3-D) images. We compiled a chart of electromyographic (EMG) profiles of the same 27 muscles during the cat step cycle from previous studies and used these to modulate the number of active MNs in the 3-D images. The step cycle was divided into 100 equal intervals corresponding to about 7 ms each for gait of moderate speed. For each of these 100 intervals, the level of EMG of each muscle was used to scale the number of dots displayed randomly within the volume of the corresponding MN pool in the digital model. One hundred images of the spinal cord were thereby generated, and these could be played in sequence as a continuous-loop movie representing rhythmical stepping. A rostrocaudal oscillation of activity in hindlimb MN pools emerged. This was confirmed by computing the locus of the center of activation of the MNs in the 100 consecutive frames of the movie. The caudal third of the lumbosacral enlargement showed intense MN activity during the stance phase of locomotion. During the swing phase, the focus of activation shifted abruptly to the rostral part of the enlargement. At the stance-swing transition, a transient focus of activity formed in the most caudal part of the lumbosacral enlargement. This was associated with activation of gracilis, posterior biceps, posterior semimembranosus, and semitendinosus muscles. These muscles move the foot back and up to clear the ground during locomotion, a role that could be described as retraction. The spatiotemporal distribution of neuronal activity in the spinal cord during normal locomotion with descending control and sensory inputs intact has not been visualized before. The model can be used in the future to characterize spatiotemporal activity of spinal MNs in the absence of descending and sensory inputs and to compare these to spatiotemporal patterns in spinal MNs in normal locomotion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations177
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeurophysiologySame topicMuscle activation and electromyography studiesFrench-language works237,207