The response of the high altitude C4 grass Muhlenbergia montana (Nutt.) A.S. Hitchc. to long‐ and short‐term chilling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The acclimation of C(4) photosynthesis to low temperature was studied in the montane grass Muhlenbergia montana in order to evaluate inherent limitations in the C(4) photosynthetic pathway following chilling. Plants were grown in growth cabinets at 26 degrees C days, but at night temperatures of either 16 degrees C (the control treatment), 4 degrees C for at least 28 nights (the cold-acclimated treatment), or 1 night (the cold-stress treatment). Below a measurement temperature of 25 degrees C, little difference in the thermal response of the net CO(2) assimilation rate (A) was observed between the control and cold-acclimated treatment. By contrast, above 30 degrees C, A in the cold-acclimated treatment was 10% greater than in the control treatment. The temperature responses of Rubisco activity and net CO(2) assimilation rate were similar below 22 degrees C, indicating high metabolic control of Rubisco over the rate of photosynthesis at cool temperatures. Analysis of the response of A to intercellular CO(2) level further supported a major limiting role for Rubisco below 20 degrees C. As temperature declined, the CO(2) saturated plateau of A exhibited large reductions, while the initial slope of the CO(2) response was little affected. This type of response is consistent with a Rubisco limitation, rather than limitations in PEP carboxylase capacity. Stomatal limitations at low temperature were not apparent because photosynthesis was CO(2) saturated below 23 degrees C at air levels of CO(2). In contrast to the response of photosynthesis to temperature and CO(2) in plants acclimated for 4 weeks to low night temperature, plants exposed to 4 degrees C for one night showed substantial reduction in photosynthetic capacity at temperatures above 20 degrees C. Because these reductions were at both high and low CO(2), enzymes associated with the C(4) carbon cycle were implicated as the major mechanisms for the chilling inhibition. These results demonstrate that C(4) plants from climates with low temperature during the growing season can fully acclimate to cold stress given sufficient time. This acclimation appears to involve reversal of injury to the C(4) cycle following initial exposure to low temperature. By contrast, carbon gain at low temperatures generally appears to be constrained by the carboxylation capacity of Rubisco, regardless of acclimation time. The inability to overcome the Rubisco limitation at low temperature may be an inherent limitation restricting C(4) photosynthetic performance in cooler climates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".