Développement des connaissances sur les enjeux liés à la violence faite aux femmes en Ontario français — Deux cas de figure : la prostitution et l’accès aux services en droit de la famille
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article porte sur le développement des connaissances dans le réseau de la violence faite aux femmes en Ontario français. S’ancrant dans une épistémologie résolument féministe, cette construction collective du savoir au sujet des enjeux auxquels sont confrontées les intervenantes en violence faite aux femmes s’élabore principalement au moyen de mécanismes de concertation. À ce jour, il existe peu d’articles sur la mise en place de tels mécanismes qui nourrissent les pratiques d’intervention et mènent à l’action. C’est pour combler cette lacune que nous proposons cette analyse exploratoire d’un sujet qui s’avère important quand on veut participer au développement souhaité et préparer la relève.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".