MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1905156128 · doi:10.1093/genetics/155.1.159

<i>Drosophila wee1</i> Has an Essential Role in the Nuclear Divisions of Early Embryogenesis

2000· article· en· W1905156128 on OpenAlexaff
Donald M. Price, Simon Rabinovitch, Patrick H. O’Farrell, Shelagh D. Campbell

Bibliographic record

VenueGenetics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Institute of General Medical Sciences
KeywordsWee1BiologyCyclin-dependent kinase 1GeneticsMitosisCdc25Drosophila embryogenesisGeneCell biologySchizosaccharomyces pombeCell cycleMutantDrosophila melanogaster

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Drosophila, the maternally expressed mei-41 and grp genes are required for successful execution of the nuclear division cycles of early embryogenesis. In fission yeast, genes encoding similar kinases (rad3 and chk1, respectively) are components of a cell cycle checkpoint that delays mitosis by inhibitory phosphorylation of Cdk1. We have identified mutations in a gene encoding a Cdk1 inhibitory kinase, Drosophila wee1 (Dwee1). Like mei-41 and grp, Dwee1 is zygotically dispensable but is required maternally for completing the embryonic nuclear cycles. The arrest phenotype of Dwee1 mutants, as well as genetic interactions between Dwee1, grp, and mei-41 mutations, suggest that Dwee1 is functioning in the same regulatory pathway as these genes. These findings imply that inhibitory phosphorylation of Cdk1 by Dwee1 is required for proper regulation of the early syncytial cycles of embryogenesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations65
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeneticsSame topicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamicsFrench-language works237,207