MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1905441372 · doi:10.1002/2013jc008900

Diffusive boundary layer influenced by bottom boundary hydrodynamics in tidal flows

2013· article· en· W1905441372 on OpenAlexaff
Jianing Wang, Hao Wei, Youyu Lu, Liang Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Oceans · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans CanadaBedford Institute of Oceanography
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBoundary layerDissipationTurbulenceTurbulence kinetic energyKinetic energyGeologySedimentMechanicsBoundary (topology)ThermodynamicsPhysicsGeomorphologyClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[1] Field measurements of the diffusive boundary layer (DBL) and bottom boundary layer (BBL) in two distinctly different coastal ocean environments are analyzed. The dynamic conditions of the BBL have a strong influence on the DBL thickness (δDBL) and oxygen diffusive fluxes at the sediment-water interface. Three different estimates of the Batchelor length (LB) in the BBL are obtained from the measured dissipation rate of turbulent kinetic energy (εm), turbulent friction velocity (u*), and tidal velocity (Um) and bottom roughness length (z0). The two estimates of LB from εm and u* have low correlations with δDBL. The estimate of LB from Um and z0 has a higher correlation with δDBL at both sites, suggesting a simple estimation of δDBL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research OceansSame topicOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesFrench-language works237,207