MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1905586049 · doi:10.5539/esr.v4n2p1

Compositional Characteristics of Geophagic Clays in Parts of Southern Nigeria

2015· article· en· W1905586049 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Okunlola OA, Owoyemi KA

Bibliographic record

VenueEarth Science Research · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicTherapeutic Uses of Natural Elements
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNontroniteKaoliniteIllitePalygorskiteAtterberg limitsHalloysiteQuartzClay mineralsMineralogyChemistryEnvironmental chemistryGeologyEnvironmental scienceGeochemistrySoil waterSoil science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Geophagy is the practice of deliberate consumption of soil and clay deposits by humans, birds and other animalsin the wild. It is closely related to pica, a classified eating disorder characterized by abnormal cravings fornon-food items. The focus of this work is to determine the compositional characteristics of the geophagic claysconsumed around Asaba, Benin, Ibadan and Aramoko-Ekiti areas in southern Nigeria in order to get an insightinto the role these clay constituents play in geophagy. This study includes XRD aided mineralogicaldetermination, chemical analysis of major and trace elements using ICP-MS instrumentation, physical testsincluding determination of Atterberg limits. Biological parameters such as the bacteriological content andnutritional value were also determined from in situ samples of geophagic clays. X-ray diffraction analysis of tenrepresentative samples collected from these areas show mineralogical composition of predominantly kaolinitewith minor palygorskite, nontronite, illite, K-feldspar and halloysite, while the nonclay fraction is mainly quartz..The relatively high percentage of fine grained kaolinite content in the geophagic clays is similar to that inkaolinite-based western medicines that are marketed for the purpose of alleviating gastrointestinal upsets. Thischaracteristic is also revealed in the chemical analysis of the study samples which show average values of majorelements such Si02 (50.9%), Al2O3 (25.4%) and Fe2O3 (2.9%); while MgO, P2O5 and Ba are all below 0.5%. Thebacteriological analysis shows high total bacteria count of 9.8 x 104 – 11.4 x 104 cfu/gm for the Asaba sampleswhile the Benin and Aramoko-Ekiti samples have an average total bacterial count of 2.1 x 104. Cfu/gm TheIbadan samples have the lowest total bacteria count of 0.2 x 104. cfu/gm. The low total bacteria count of theIbadan sample may be due to the baking of the sample before consumption as against samples from Asaba,consumed fresh. Staphylococcus aureus and Micrococcus acidiophilus are the two micro-organisms common toall samples. Analysis for nutritional value indicates that geophagic clays have little or no nutritional value forhumans. Results of this study show that the rich kaolinite content of these clays could serve as an antacid, whilebacteriological and trace element content reveals the harmful effect of these clays on consumers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.303
GPT teacher head0.544
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEarth Science ResearchSame topicTherapeutic Uses of Natural ElementsFrench-language works237,207