MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1905628787 · doi:10.7202/1008920ar

De la commission parent aux réformes de la santé et au code des professions, 1961-1974

2012· article· fr· W1905628787 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Julien Prud’homme

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches sociographiques · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La signification de la Révolution tranquille est souvent envisagée sous l’angle d’un « récit de la technocratisation », qui repose sur la double idée d’une continuité claire entre les réformes du temps et d’une action centralisée entre les mains de quelques acteurs. Ces idées, recevables, ont pourtant fait l’objet de peu d’études approfondies. L’analyse de l’unité d’un train de réformes touchant à la fois les universités, la santé et l’encadrement des professions, permet de préciser ce qui les unit, tant sur le plan des idées que de l’action concrète. Outre son apport empirique (notamment sur l’histoire des professions et les racines du « système » québécois de la santé), une telle démarche pose le Québec comme cas d’espèce d’une sociologie de l’expertise qui offre des balises originales pour une sociologie de l’État.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.030
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.173
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0300.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.466
GPT teacher head0.573
Teacher spread0.108 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2012
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherches sociographiquesSame topicEducation, sociology, and vocational trainingFrench-language works237,207