Long‐Acting Morphine Following Hip or Knee Replacement: A Randomized, Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement surgery experience unmanaged pain during postoperative physiotherapy sessions. It was theorized that a baseline opioid would improve pain management. OBJECTIVES: To examine the effectiveness of adding long-acting oral morphine to a routine postoperative regimen for total hip or knee replacement surgery. METHODS: The present study was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial for patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement surgery. All patients received routine postoperative analgesia; in addition, the treatment group received long-acting oral morphine 30 mg orally twice daily for three days, while the control group received placebo capsules. The primary end point was a decrease in pain scores by two points on a 0- to 10-point pain rating scale. Secondary end points included adverse effects, acute confusion, pain-related interferences in function and sleep, length of stay and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Two hundred patients were enrolled in the present study (March 2004 to March 2006). Although the groups were large enough to yield statistical significance, most pain scores did not reach the predetermined improvement for clinical significance. Additionally, there was an increase in opioid usage (P<0.0001), vomiting (P=0.0148) and oversedation (P=0.08). There were no statistically significant changes in function or sleep. Improved satisfaction with pain management was minimal (P=0.052). DISCUSSION: The present study was undertaken to determine the value of adding a long-acting opioid (morphine) to the usual care of patients undergoing total hip or total knee replacement surgery. The results yielded minimally improved pain scores and additional adverse effects (vomiting and oversedation). Published research in which long-acting opioids (oxycodone) were used for similar postoperative procedures did not robustly report improved pain scores. In addition, patients using a long-acting opioid (oxycodone) during the postoperative period reported somnolence, dizziness and confusion. Statistically, the patients in the present study showed higher confusion scores and no improvement for pain-related interferences with activity or walking. The treatment group did report increased satisfaction; however, the significance was weak. CONCLUSIONS: Thirty milligrams twice per day of long-acting morphine from days 1 to 3 following total hip and total knee replacement surgery provided minimal improvements in pain scores, and more adverse effects in the treatment group. The overall strength of evidence for improved outcomes is minimal and thus not supported.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".