MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1905768510

Ecology, ecology, ecology

2005· article· en· W1905768510 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Carlos Álvarez‐Dardet, John Ashton

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed Central · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicChild and Adolescent Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEcologyWonderGlossaryMedicinePublic healthSocioeconomic statusEnvironmental healthPsychologyPopulationBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this issue, our Glossary tackles the vexed issue of differing definitions that are prevalent in ecological perspectives on health research—something that is of growing importance in public health: many of our papers, in one way and another, involve some kind of ecological approach. A paper from Montreal, with a linked Editorial, explores the dimensions of socioeconomic status that influence toddlers’ health, and concludes that a serious lack of money has an impact regardless of the mother’s level of education and of neonatal health problems.
 See pages 2, 42 The wonder-drug aspirin continues to find new applications, and a conference held in Wales, UK earlier this …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.011
Scholarly communication0.0070.010
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed Central→Same topicChild and Adolescent Health→French-language works237,207→