The role of non-corticosteroid related factors in osteonecrosis (ON) in systemic lupus erythematosus: a nested case-control study of inception patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Several factors have been associated with the development of osteonecrosis (ON) in SLE but corticosteroid (CS) therapy has been the most consistent association. We sought to determine factors that predisposed to, or protected from, the development of ON in lupus patients when cumulative oral corticosteroid doses were matched between cases and controls, thereby removing presence of corticosteroid therapy and cumulative dose as risk factors. A nested case-control study of an inception cohort of SLE patients was used to determine the clinical, laboratory and therapeutic differences between patients who developed their first ON event and patients who did not develop ON, having matched these groups for their cumulative oral corticosteroid doses. Of the 570 patients seen within the first year after diagnosis 65 (11.4%) developed ON. None of the variables examined were found to confer additional ON risk in multivariate analysis. It appears that the major factor associated with the development of ON is corticosteroid therapy. Factors which may protect a majority of patients on corticosteroids from developing ON remain to be elucidated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".