MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1905860573 · doi:10.3917/gmcc.209.0025

Bibendum et les débuts de l'aviation

2003· article· fr· W1905860573 on OpenAlex
Antoine Champeaux

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGuerres mondiales et conflits contemporains · 2003
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Historical and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bibendum et les débuts de l’aviation Les frères André et Édouard Michelin sont connus pour avoir créé la manufacture de pneumatiques Michelin et le célèbre personnage publicitaire Bibendum . Leur intérêt pour l’aviation l’est beaucoup moins. Généreux mécènes, ils offrent d’importantes sommes qui aident l’aéronautique naissante à prendre son essor. La Coupe Michelin d’aviation gagnée par Wilbur Wright en France en 1908 en est la première illustration. Mais, au-delà de l’aspect sportif, les deux frères entreprennent une véritable campagne en faveur de l’aviation dont ils pressentent l’usage militaire en créant, en 1911, le prix Michelin de l’Aéro-cible, épreuve de lancement de projectiles destinée à démontrer la puissance de l’aéroplane. En 1912, face à la menace allemande, ils esquissent une doctrine d’emploi et de mobilisation de l’aviation en distribuant à 1 million d’exemplaires une brochure intitulée Notre avenir est dans l’Air .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it