MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1905976448 · doi:10.20502/rbg.v15i1.478

COMPARTIMENTAÇÃO MORFOESTRUTURAL DA BACIA DO RIO VERDE, SUL DE MINAS GERAIS

2014· article· pt· W1905976448 on OpenAlexaff
Roberto Marques Neto, Archimedes Pérez Filho

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Brasileira de Geomorfologia · 2014
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicGeography and Environmental Studies
Canadian institutionsCégep de Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesGeographyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O presente artigo divulga proposta de compartimentação morfoestrutural para a bacia do Rio Verde, localizada na parte meridional do Estado de Minas Gerais em terrenos da Serra da Mantiqueira, Planalto do Alto Rio Grande e Planalto de Varginha, apresentando litologias diversas (metagranitoides arqueanos, metassedimentos supracrustais proterozoicos e intrusões alcalinas cretáceo-paleocenas) distribuídas em considerável diversidade de formas de relevo. A análise integrada entre a litologia, os lineamentos estruturais, a rede de drenagem e os padrões de formas de relevo discerniu os seguintes compartimentos morfoestruturais: Patamares de cimeira da Mantiqueira (desmembrados em cinco subcompartimentos), Patamares escalonados da Mantiqueira, Planalto de Cruzília-Minduri, Planalto alongado de Lambari, Planalto de São Lourenço-Caxambu, Planalto de Três Corações, Planalto rebaixado de Varginha e Cristas monoclinais. A compartimentação revelou forte controle morfoestrutural vinculado ao rifte continental do sudeste do Brasil associado a uma acentuada dinâmica morfotectônica sobreposta em função da interferência de efeitos diastróficos neotectônicos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.191
Threshold uncertainty score0.380

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Brasileira de GeomorfologiaSame topicGeography and Environmental StudiesFrench-language works237,207