MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1906051169 · doi:10.1109/ceidp.1990.201411

High stress space charge limited current flow in dielectric oil under ramped voltage application

2002· article· en· W1906051169 on OpenAlexaff
A. T. Watson, D.H. Ren

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpace chargeElectronElectrohydrodynamicsElectric fieldPhysicsThermal conductionDielectricPopulationMechanicsCondensed matter physicsOptoelectronicsThermodynamicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A mathematical model for interpreting experimental data obtained from ramped voltage testing of transformer oil is presented. Current is perceived to flow alternately by convection and conduction when the electric field strength is high enough to initiate detrapping of electrons and field dissociation. Homopolar injection of electrons and positive ions is considered to delineate two regimes in which space-charge-limited current is directly related to a simple power of the applied potential. The injection process leads to the launching of solitary waves of the sine-Gordon type from each electrode and detrapping occurs within the wavefront of these. In direct response to this the remaining trapped electrons reorganize into a Beltrami flow field contained within small cells which coincide with the Debye spheres that are pertinent to the electrostatics of the free charge population. These cells act as quasiparticles passing through the dielectric liquid with which they interact to sustain the electrohydrodynamic flow which constitutes their drift motion as carriers in the applied field.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.768
Threshold uncertainty score0.526

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Transformer Diagnostics and InsulationFrench-language works237,207