MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1906188646

INET'96 : Le concile oecuménique

2008· article· fr· W1906188646 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCommposite · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligious Tourism and Spaces
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans le cadre du rassemblement annuel de l'Internet Society (ISOC), Montreal a recu, l'ete dernier, des grands noms de la communaute internationale de la telematique. A plusieurs egards, la conference Inet 96 ressemblait aux celebrations qui ponctuent l'histoire religieuse. L'amenagement des lieux, le decorum qui entourait l'evenement ainsi que le ton des communications, rappelaient l'ambiance de la messe des jours sacres. Sceptique face aux resolutions prises lors de cette rencontre qu'elle compare au concile oecumenique*, Maryse Rivard relate l'evenement dans un style assez particulier. Elle presente et commente le resume de deux ateliers critiques, l'un portant sur la valeur morale d'Internet et l'autre sur son entree dans les ecoles. Elle brosse ensuite le portrait de la situation d'Internet dans les reseaux scolaires du Quebec et conclue sur une comparaison des mouvements d'informatisation et d'evangelisation mondiaux.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.370
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it