The sympathoadrenal system mediates the blood pressure and cardiac effects of human coagulation factor XII-related "new pressor protein".
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the major cardiovascular effects of human plasma "new pressor protein" (NPP) and how the adrenal medulla contributes to these effects. METHODS: NPP was injected into bioassay rats intravenously, and the effects on blood pressure and cardiac function were investigated. Acute adrenal medullectomy (2MDX), alpha- and beta-adrenergic blockade and plasma catecholamine levels were also used to evaluate the role of the sympathoadrenal system in mediating the NPP effects. RESULTS: NPP significantly raised systolic blood pressure (SBP) and mean arterial pressure but not diastolic blood pressure (DBP), with no significant change in total peripheral resistance. Heart rate, cardiac output and stroke volume rose by 16%, 53% and 36%, respectively. Plasma catecholamines increased massively, notably adrenaline, raising the adrenaline to noradrenaline ratio from about 4:1 to 18:1. 2MDX attenuated the increments of SBP and heart rate by more than 90% and more than 70%, respectively, implicating the adrenal medulla. Beta-adrenergic blockade (propranolol) potentiated the NPP-induced increase of SBP and DBP, but not that of heart rate. Combined alpha- and beta-adrenergic blockade (phentolamine and propranolol) blocked the rise in SBP, DBP and heart rate. CONCLUSIONS: NPP's hypertensive action is attributable mainly to increases in systolic blood pressure, heart rate and cardiac output (an increase in heart rate and stroke volume) with massive release of adrenal medullary catecholamines. Such effects suggest a novel axis between coagulation factor XII and the sympathoadrenal system, the cardiovascular effects of which are controlled by combined alpha- and beta-adrenergic blockade, but not by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition. Clinical relevance depends on whether NPP is formed in vivo in thrombotic states.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".