MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1906433874 · doi:10.1149/2.0071510jss

Characterization of Stretchable Interconnects Fabricated Using a Low Cost Metallization Transfer Process onto PDMS

2015· article· en· W1906433874 on OpenAlexafffund
Daniel Hilbich, Gary Yu, Bonnie L. Gray, Lesley Shannon

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersSimon Fraser UniversityNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMaterials scienceFabricationCharacterization (materials science)ElectronicsTransfer printingStretchable electronicsElectrical conductorNanotechnologyProcess (computing)Composite materialComputer scienceElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The growing number of applications requiring conformal electronic devices incorporated into unconventional and dynamic surfaces has led to an increase in the development of stretchable electronics. Together with novel materials and fabrication processes, innovative conductive patterns are being developed in order to meet the needs of modern applications. Here, we present the design, fabrication, and characterization of first-order curved Peano structures fabricated using a newly developed thick film copper metallization transfer process onto PDMS. In order to maximize the stretchability of these structures, we present a characterization and analysis of the relationship between relative resistance and tensile strain in fabricated devices while systematically varying the geometric parameters of various curve designs. The response of the structures to cyclic failure and recovery is also characterized. These results demonstrate that the newly developed transfer process can be used to fabricate stretchable Peano curves and provide insight into the geometric optimization of these curves in stretchable electronics applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Journal of Solid State Science and TechnologySame topicAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting MaterialsFrench-language works237,207