Bibliographic record
Abstract
MUY RECIENTEMENTE EN EL OBSERVATORIO DE NEUTRINOS SOLARES (SNO) DE SUDBURY CANADA, DIERON A CONOCER LA PRIMERA EVIDENCIA EXPERIMENTAL DE QUE LOS NEUTRINOS PRODUCIDOS EN EL CORAZON DEL SOL CAMBIAN DE IDENTIDAD EN SU VIAJE HASTA LA TIERRA. LA EXPLICACION MAS PROBABLE DE DICHO FENOMENO SON LAS LLAMADAS OSCILACIONES DE NEUTRINOS. EN EL PRESENTE TRABAJO DAMOS UNA INTRODUCCION DIDACTICA A LAS OSCILACIONES DE NEUTRINOS, TANTO EN EL VACIO COMO EN MEDIOS MATERIALES; DESTACANDO EN ESTE ULTIMO CASO EL EFECTO RESONANTE MSW. DICHO TRABAJO ESTA FORMULADO PARA EL CASO DE DOS GENERACIONES DE NEUTRINOS, SIN EMBARGO, DAMOS UN BOSQUEJO PARA EL CASO DE TRES GENERACIONES. Abstract RECENTLY THE SOLAR NEUTRINO OBSERVATORY (SNO) GROUP IN SUDBURY CANDA, SHOWED THE FIRST EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE THAT NEUTRINO PRODUCED IN THE SUN´S CORE, CHANGE THEIR FLAVOUR WHEN THEY PROPAGATE. THE MOST PROBABLY EXPLANATION OF SUCH PHENOMENON ARE THE NEUTRINO OSCILLATION. IN THIS WORK WE GIVE A PEDAGOGICAL INTRODUCTION TO NEUTRINO OSCILLATION, BOTH IN THE VACUM AND IN THE MATERIAL MEDIUM, EMPHATHIZING THE RESONANT MSW EFFECT IN THE MEDIUM. THIS WORK IS FORMULATED FOR TWO NEUTRINO GENERATIONS HOWEVER, WE GIVE A BRIEF SUMMARY OF THREE NEUTRINO GENERATIONS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".