Girdling and tree death: lessons from<i>Chamaecyparis pisifera</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To investigate the effects of girdling on the water relation of trees, we measured a number of water-status parameters and morphological features following trunk and branch girdling of Chamaecyparis pisifera Siebold & Zucc. Girdling caused a marked reduction in the water-conduction area of the trunk cross section at the girdled part. Some girdled trees generated intense acoustic emissions (AE), simultaneously decreased leaf water potentials (LWP), and then died within 1 year. However, others lived for more than 2 years after girdling. In these survivors, the water-conduction area of the trunk cross section was reduced but not entirely blocked, and LWP decreases did not occur. Consequently, we conclude that girdling affects xylem water conductivity and sometimes causes short-term (within 1 year) tree death by blocking water uptake from soil to leaves. The results of this study on whether tree death from girdling occurs sooner or later could be important in the use of girdling for thinning management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".