MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1907455510 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2005.1465167

On Phase Noise in Quadrature Cross-Coupled Oscillators

2005· article· en· W1907455510 on OpenAlex
Luís B. Oliveira, Ahmed Allam, I.M. Filanovsky, Jorge Fernandes

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhase noiseOscillator phase noiseRelaxation oscillatorPhysicsVackář oscillatorQuadrature (astronomy)Perturbation (astronomy)Control theory (sociology)Local oscillatorComputer scienceVoltage-controlled oscillatorNoise figureOpticsQuantum mechanicsOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A cross-coupled relaxation oscillator has two outputs of the same frequency, which are in quadrature. In this paper a comparative study of the phase noise in a cross-coupled relaxation oscillator is given. We present a high level (system) study of the oscillator and analyse the oscillator stability. The derivation proves analytically that cross-coupling reduces the influence of a perturbation (noise) on the oscillator output. Both high-level and circuit simulations at 5GHz are presented to confirm the theoretical results. Close to 10dB improvement in phase noise performance due to coupling was found, and the phase noise performance compared with that of a coupled LC oscillator was achieved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.139
Threshold uncertainty score0.854

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207