Les enseignant-e-s de soutien en Italie: leur formation aux méthodes et philosophies inclusives
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article porte sur les fondements theoriques et methodologiques de la formation pour les enseignant-e-s de soutien specialises pour l’inclusion en Italie et sur les effets de cette formation. Les resultats de trois recherches, menees avec ce type d’enseignant-e-s compares avec les enseignant-e-s reguliers, ont montre que une formation specifique fondee sur la « Classification Internationale du Fonctionnement, du handicap et de la sante » (CIF) et une optique metacognitive, permit un processus de reflexion pour la maintenance d’une conception constructiviste du developpement de l’intelligence des eleves et la prise de conscience de la regulation de ses emotions, en protegeant les enseignant-e-s de soutien du risque d’epuisement. Mots-cles : enseignant-e-s de soutien, formation, metacognition, inclusion, Italie
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it