Mudanças na estrutura familiar em livros infantis canadenses e brasileiros altamente recomendados
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O objetivo deste trabalho e apresentar os resultados de um projeto de pesquisa sobre livros literarios para criancas altamente recomendados, produzidos no Canada e no Brasil recentemente. O projeto foi realizado com apoio do Governo do Canada, por meio do Understanding Canada Program . Duas instituicoes canadenses tiveram papel importante na investigacao inicial: The Canadian Children’s Book Centre (CCBC), em Toronto, e The Centre for Research in Young People’s Texts and Cultures (CRYTC), da Universidade de Winnipeg, em Winnipeg. No Brasil, a Fundacao Nacional do Livro Infantil e Juvenil (FNLIJ) constituiu fonte importante de pesquisa. Os objetivos principais do projeto sao: investigar livros canadenses literarios para criancas, recentemente publicados e recomendados, tendo como foco de atencao os modos como estariam representadas mudancas na estrutura familiar, especialmente no que concerne a figura do pai; identificar possiveis semelhancas e diferencas entre livros infantis canadenses e brasileiros, tambem recentes e recomendados.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".