MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1907743284

[HIF-1 activation during tumor progression: implications and consequences].

2006· article· en· W1907743284 on OpenAlexaff
Marie-Claude Lauzier, Maude D. Michaud, Marc-André Déry, Darren E. Richard

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsHôtel-Dieu de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypoxia-Inducible Factor 1AngiogenesisTranscription factorHypoxia (environmental)Cell biologyProtein subunitCancer researchTumor progressionBiologyHypoxia-inducible factorsSignal transductionDownregulation and upregulationAnaerobic glycolysisGlycolysisGeneChemistryBiochemistryEnzyme
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The transcription factor hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) regulates the expression of more than 70 genes in response to hypoxic stress. Composed of two subunits, HIF-1 activity is modulated by the availability of the HIF-1alpha protein subunit. The stability and transcriptional activity of this extremely labile protein is affected by post-translational modifications. Hypoxia and non-hypoxic stimuli allow the formation of an active HIF-1 complex in many types of human cancers. However, the exact implication of HIF-1 activation in tumor progression is still not precisely understood. The HIF-1 dependent genic products are involved in tumoral angiogenesis, in the metabolic switch to anaerobic glycolysis and in prosurvival, proliferative and apoptotic mechanisms. In this review, we will focus on the hypoxic and non-hypoxic stimuli leading to HIF-1 activation and in its implication in tumor processes. We will highlight the most recent developments in molecular and cellular signaling that are upstream and downstream of HIF-1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→Same topicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism→French-language works237,207→