MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Controversies and Concerns in Hemodialysis
Series Editor: Marcello Tonelli: Calcific Uremic Arteriolopathy Should Be Treated Conservatively

2010· article· en· W1907806740 on OpenAlexaff
Mark Courtney, Neesh Pannu

Bibliographic record

VenueSeminars in Dialysis · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParathyroid Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCalciphylaxisDermatologySurgeryInternal medicineCalcification

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Calcific uremic arteriolopathy (CUA) is a small vessel vasculopathy affecting mainly stage IV and V renal failure patients. It is characterized typically by non-healing, painful skin ulcerations and carries a poor prognosis. Little is known about the pathogenesis, but abnormal mechanisms of vascular calcification have been postulated to contribute. Available therapies target promotion of wound healing and lowering of elevated parathyroid hormone levels and the calcium-phosphate product. There are no prospective or randomized controlled trials to guide choice of therapeutic agents, yet available therapies may subject patients to adverse side effects, and/or increase program expenditures. Therefore, we favor a graded approach to treatment of CUA, commencing conservatively with the least harmful and most cost-efficient measures available.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.160
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeminars in DialysisSame topicParathyroid Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207