Exploring the Consequences of IED Deployment with a Generalized Linear Model Implementation of the Canadian Traveller Problem
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The deployment of improvised explosive devices (IEDs) along major roadways has been a favoured strategy of insurgents in recent war zones, both for the ability to cause damage to targets along roadways at minimal cost, but also as a means of controlling the flow of traffic and causing additional expense to opposing forces. Among other related approaches (which we discuss), the adversarial problem has an analogue in the Canadian Traveller Problem, wherein a stretch of road is blocked with some independent probability, and the state of the road is only discovered once the traveller reaches one of the intersections that bound this stretch of road. We discuss the implementation of ideas from social network analysis, namely the notion of “betweenness centrality”, and how this can be adapted to the notion of deployment of IEDs with the aid of Generalized Linear Models (GLMs): namely, how we can model the probability of an IED deployment in terms of the increased effort due to Canadian betweenness, how we can include expert judgement on the probability of a deployment, and how we can extend the approach to estimation and updating over several time steps. 1
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".